Microsoft / Yahoo Merger: The Enterprise Search Angle

Jake was chatting about the Microsoft/Yahoo merger, describing how little sense it made. I agreed mostly, until I remembered something Steve Ballmer said about Google in 2006. This was when Google was poaching Microsoft talent:

"Enterprise search is our business, it's our house and Google is not going to take that business."

ummmmm.... what!? I was totally confused... because Microsoft most certainly did NOT own enterprise search. Neither did Google. Nobody did. FAST and Autonomy/Verity had some claim... Oracle had a solution or two... but in reality nobody in the world had a product that satisfactorily solved this problem.

How do I know? Well, I was a content management developer, helping create the most flexible product in that market. If anybody -- and I mean anybody -- had a halfway decent search engine for the whole enterprise, I would know. We evaluated dozens, and all fell short for multiple, multiple, so many reasons. Usually flexibility, security, insufficient context sensitivity, encoding bugs, performance... or perhaps I'm just being hyper-critical. Nevertheless, we integrated with several of them, and made work-arounds for their limitations.

Anyway... considering Microsoft's recent acquisition of FAST, and the purchase of Yahoo, this means one thing to me: Microsoft is finally getting serious about owning enterprise search. With Yahoo, Microsoft also gets Omnifind: a "free" product made by IBM that's specifically designed for enterprise search. Unless this is a desperate move, that's the only sane excuse for spending so many billions of dollars for Yahoo. They're trying to do for enterprise content what Google did for web content... That could easily be a $10 billion market.

Of course, I'm not particularly impressed that they will actually succeed. And even if they did, they would be "forced" to have an open API that allows easy integration with non-Microsoft products... otherwise, they wouldn't really have an enterprise search product, would they?

Either way, by 2010 they might have something interesting to show off...

Comments

yup

I sneaked in a reference to this or two in my post, but you're on the right track. I remember Ballmer saying that too, essentially extending their dominance of the enterprise to include search and everything else. I love that guy.

Enterprise search is still wide open, but not like it was. After the FAST acquisition, did you see the investment Intel/SAP made in Endeca? $15 million in cash, which ain't chump change. Google is a threat there now with the black box Mini/GSA approach. FAST+Sharepoint may be a good option.

This is a really interesting

This is a really interesting point that makes a lot of sense to Microsoft's this move. Very interesting, you are probably the only one who brought this up. Nice one, Bex.

FAST+Sharepoint is compelling...

but true enterprise search also needs to integrate with those big huge funky mainframe applications... theres a TON of important junk buried there...

My guess: Microsoft is a bit too myopic to pull this off. Neither Google nor Microsoft seem to "get" what enterprise information management is, so they're going to seriously miss the mark on enterprise search. They might get close enough for workgroup level stuff... and have a moderately clunky product for small / medium businesses... still a worthy market.

But... if Oracle could nail this problem -- they do have a head start -- and mix it with a Sharepoint killer priced for small biz, then Microsoft would have serious problems.

but...

Agreed that microsoft is trying to get in on the enterprise search party (buying FAST made that fairly obvious), but im not sure what Yahoo brings to the table as far as Enterprisey-ness goes.

Yahoo own and support a bunch of open source stuff, which i cant see MS continuing with. For example, www.zimbra.com, offers a nice open source alternative to MS Exchange. Can you see MS maintaining that?!

So other than removing a huge competitor from the market in general, what else do MS gain technology wise?

They gain Omnifind

http://omnifind.ibm.yahoo.net/

Note: I updated the article to make this more obvious.

Its "free", and does more than Google's search appliance. IBM helped Yahoo make it, so its likely to have lots of "enterprisey" bells and whistles.

I've never implemented it, so I can't judge how polished it is. But... Microsoft is basically stealing IBM's technology and giving it away for free to take on their biggest competitor... sounds like classic Microsoft to me! ;-)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This form prevents comments spam...