Cordell sent me an interesting article about how IT Certification is becoming less important. Some bloggers -- like James -- believe IT Certifications could have value if they just raised their standards a bit... but I'm not so sure. You used to be able to take the average tech-inclined person, send him through a training course, and then get him a decent job in IT. Not so much these days, and its not because of the ailing economy. Here are some other reasons:
The fundamental problem is that it is unbelievably difficult to determine how good an IT person will be based on a piece of paper.
Folks on The Daily WTF and Joel On Software have discussed endlessly on what is the proper mix of education, experience, and certification... each has benefits... but most employers prefer college degrees to certifications.
However, this raises another question... since all education loses value over time, why would an employer prefer a candidate with a 5-year old college degree, compared to a 6-month old certification?
Probably because people have a general idea of the quality of education that is possible at a well-known college. They can look up the name in any number of schools that rank college programs, and have some level of third-party validation. Also, you never quite know where a new employee's true talents may lie... Most of what I learned for my Computer Science degree is outdated, and not frequently relevant for my job... However, those were not the only courses I took in college. I took dozens of non-computer courses that helped me be meticulous when experimenting, write more clearly, think more abstractly, and visualize complex integrated systems better. These courses helped me develop true skills and talents, as opposed to just filling my head with stale knowledge.
Personally... I feel that a college degree means you can learn, experience means you've made the typical rookie mistakes, and certifications/conference attendance means you're dedicated to continuing your education. Of course, none of these demonstrate that your knowledge/skills/talents will be of any practical use for your employer... so its always a risk.
Comments
What about the cross industry certifications
Hello Bex,
Whay is you take on cross industry certifications like the ones from AIIM?
basically the same...
A certificate from AIIM means you're interested in the industry, and want to become a better practitioner... I've seen some of their materials, and in general I think its good. However, the problem is that without some kind of third party that ranks organizations that issue certificates, its tough for somebody outside the industry to know what that certificate is worth.
Yes, but...
I started to type a comment, but it got to be too large, so I blogged it: http://www.dannorris.com/2009/01/15/certifications-response-to-bex-huffs-post/
The certifications can make
The certifications can make more value... But I think we should make experience and certification in the same time.
Thanks for broaching the topic
You poured water on a seed sitting in fertile soil. =)
I am left not knowing whether to reply here, Dan's blog or the Oracle Cert blog. So I am doing all three. And following Dan's lead, putting up my own blog entry. =)
http://orajourn.blogspot.com/2009/01/teaching-and-certifcation.html
It will be interesting to see how Paul Sorensen responds.
there are a lot of ways to make Oracle certs better...
unfortunately, a lot of that effort may be for naught, unless there is also a third party system that compares and ranks certifications.
Even if Oracle did everything right, that would create a demand for people who are Oracle certified... so fakers would come out of the woodwork to create similar sounding certifications and dilute the value.
There are just inherent flaws in the environment, here... I feel pity for the hiring managers who have to do it all on their own.
Hmm... no response from Sorensen in the past 3 months?
Seems like everything went hush-hush. =) I made a new comment on Sorensen's blog after talking with someone from oracle U this morning. I get the impression that they (oracle U) is not really taking us seriously.
Re: Hmm... no response from Sorensen in the past 3 months?
I haven't heard anything... although, with the down economy, a lot of folks are brushing up on their certifications, so the Oracle U folks might just be crazy busy ;-)
Well, not quite what I was hoping for...
*grin* At least they read and commented.
http://education.oracle.com/pls/web_prod-plq-dad/emag.emag_all?months=may09#news_a
I would still love to talk to Paul one-on-one; I have a feeling that they are not quite "getting it". =)
My Experience
While I work in the SEO marketing field, I have developers and programmers that work for me as part of my team. Let me qualify that I'm not a coder or IT professional, but a marketing professional. With that being said, here's my take on certifications versus experience:
I've had the opportunity of managing both a fair number of cert folks with little or no true experience and non-cert folks with strong experience. Based on those experiences, I would take an experienced IT person over a cert only person any day of the week. While IT certs are good, my humble opinion is that real world experience is better. IT certs with no experience seem to be well versed in topics covered by the cert but sometimes lack the skills to address issues that aren't specifically addressed in a cert course. Experienced folks seem to have better skills in troubleshooting and dealing with problems.
That's my .02 worth on the topic.
I have surfed the net more
I have surfed the net more than three hours today, yet I never found any interesting article like yours. It's worth enough for me. Thanks.
Post new comment